Federal Judge Passes An Order of Injunction, Barring NCAA From Enforcing NIL Rules
For collegiate athletes, a preliminary injunction can be beneficial. The NCAA cannot impose its name, image, and likeness policies, which prohibit student-athletes from entering into contracts with boosters, according to a federal judge’s decision on Friday.
Federal Judge Passes An Order of Injunction, Barring NCAA From Enforcing NIL Rules
The decision would let those athletes to negotiate NIL deals through the transfer portal or throughout the recruitment process without violating NCAA regulations.
“The NCAA’s prohibition likely violates federal antitrust law and harms student-athletes,” Judge Clifton Corker said in a Friday letter.
NCAA can’t enforce rules on collectives discussing NIL w/ HS recruits or portal players.
NCAA faces huge pressure to proactively create rules to limit chaos by default & avoid huge losses in other litigation.
This intensifies HS recruiting. Collectives
& coaches must adapt. pic.twitter.com/FOjjXHP343— 〽️ichelle 🌹 (@Michellek4040) February 24, 2024
“While the NCAA permits student-athletes to profit from their NIL, it fails to show how the timing of when a student-athlete enters such an agreement would destroy the goal of preserving amateurism,” Corker added.
Washington won’t be saving the day, despite the NCAA’s attempt to utilize Congress to assist enforce regulations related to the payment of student-athletes. Due to the NCAA’s own selfishness, an organization that was once feared in Indianapolis has been destroyed.
In college athletics, we all knew that NIL would result in pay-for-play. However, once NIL was implemented, the NCAA decided it intended to enforce it from behind, having now seen the folly of its hasty and inadequate instructions.
🚨 BREAKING: The NCAA has been stripped of ALL AUTHORITY in regards to NIL rules… College Football is officially a free for all now
A Federal Court in Tennessee delivered an injunction against the NCAA on Friday, which states that the NCAA is "restrained from enforcing the… pic.twitter.com/jamv5B6QxH
— Blue Bloods Bias (@bluebloodsbias) February 23, 2024
Ralph D. Russo and Teresa M. Walker of the Associated Press provided details on Tennessee and Virginia’s antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA, which was filed in late January.
“The attorneys general of Tennessee and Virginia filed an antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA on Wednesday that challenged its ban on the use of name, image and likeness compensation in the recruitment of college athletes, and in response to the association’s investigation of University of Tennessee.
“The lawsuit filed in the Eastern District of Tennessee seeks to undercut NCAA rules against recruiting inducements and claims the association is ‘enforcing rules that unfairly restrict how athletes can commercially use their name, image and likeness at a critical juncture in the recruiting calendar.”
Breaking: Tennessee, Virginia granted injunction against NCAA in landmark NIL lawsuit.
‘The NCAA fails to show how such relief will cause any harm that outweighs the irreparable harm that student-athletes will face in the absence of an injunction’
Read: https://t.co/pmUKqBKKX1 pic.twitter.com/exjZvsRPVv
— OutKick (@Outkick) February 23, 2024
In addition, the complaint contends that “these anticompetitive restrictions violate the Sherman Act, harm the States and the welfare of their athletes, and should be declared unlawful and enjoined.”
The NCAA stated in a statement on Friday that while it does not oppose players receiving compensation, the decision will make collegiate sports more “chaotic.”
Turning upside down rules overwhelmingly supported by member schools will aggravate an already chaotic collegiate environment, further diminishing protections for student-athletes from exploitation,” the NCAA said.
This is a positive development for student athletes who deserve more than the backroom wheeling and dealing that the NCAA is known for.
Here in Congress, we should pass my NCAA Accountability Act and move forward with NIL legislation that protects student athletes. https://t.co/YSTblXLaHH
— Sen. Marsha Blackburn (@MarshaBlackburn) February 25, 2024
“The NCAA fully supports student-athletes making money from their name, image and likeness and is making changes to deliver more benefits to student-athletes, but an endless patchwork of state laws and court opinions make clear partnering with Congress is necessary to provide stability for the future of all college athletes.”
Collectives are currently contacting athletes who are in high school or are transferring through a portal to let them know how much they will be paid to attend a particular university. No more keeping it a secret or failing to identify inducements for what they are. Additionally, the NCAA must follow this whole thing in real time.
Today's decision in the Eastern District of Tennessee is monumental. While the preliminary injunction currently only applies in Tennessee and Virginia, it sets the stage for more states to join.
The NCAA cannot enforce its NIL policy.
Read: https://t.co/el2yaiXxSG pic.twitter.com/41Sf9Owrao
— Pete Nakos (@PeteNakos_) February 23, 2024
Since the beginning, this has been one of NIL’s selling points, if we’re being really honest. Another method of compensating athletes for going to school and making a contribution on the court or field. However, these players’ inability to have an honest discussion about the value of their athletic abilities to a school was one of the primary issues with the NCAA’s enforcement.
That part of the circus is in the past, or at least until a judge hears the entire case from both states and the NCAA, if it gets that far.
FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE-
One Accusation & The Athlete’s Career Goes Down The Hill: Matt Araiza, Trevor Bauer On The Same Ship